OK LHS, I'll try to answer your questions. But you have to realize that you can only spend so much time on PVP! Ha! Ha!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b058/8b058f2c3f11c58490165237d3d33398bfd6453a" alt="Happy :)"
You need to get out there and TRAIN! ... and videotape! Talk is cheap. I wanna see a real vault!
LHSVaulterJJR wrote: Honestly I see a lot of resemblance in the way duplantis and mcmichael vault? right or wrong? ...
Wrong! Duplantis DEFINITELY followed the Petrov model. His technique was VERY similar to mine, so it's quite easy for me to identify. I doubt that you know what cues to look for. I'll tell you later, but first, I wanna see ya jump! McMichael DEFINITELY did not follow the Petrov model.
LHSVaulterJJR wrote: ... as for the 6.4 model.. isnt that what bubka used? if so .. i still saw him have his trail leg back ... not swinging up IMMEDIATELY after his foot leaves the ground..
Bubka used the Petrov model. In fact, he's the reference vaulter for that model. Just as no one has come close (Hooker's still not there) to his WR, no one does the Petrov model better than Bubka. In fact, they developed the model together, actually. You're exactly right about his trail leg back.
The 6.40 model is what Agapit PROPOSES for how someone might break the WR. There's been some debate about whether Bubka COULD HAVE cleared 6.40 with the hip height he had over 6.01 in 1997, and Agapit does use Bubka as a sort of reference model for his 6.40 model.
However, Bubka HAS NOT cleared 6.40, and even if he did (on that 6.01 jump), it was not with all of the features that Agapit is PROPOSING for the 6.40 model. That's enough for this thread. Any more detail belongs on the 6.40 thread.
Again, LHS, I'm just trying to answer your questions, but please don't get side-tracked re the 6.40 model. Even if you spent a week to read and absorb everything that's been written about it on PVP, you'd just be wasting your time. You haven't even figured the Petrov model out yet, so please understand that you need to learn to walk before you learn to run. The 6.40 model is VERY advanced ... even for elites!
LHSVaulterJJR wrote: .. not too many advanced vaulters like this new technique on utube either
LHS, I like it ... a LOT ... I think ... so far ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97b21/97b215470b986430d17bf09d505bf3b6be6b2a4d" alt="Yes :yes:"
but I haven't SEEN it yet!
I think you can learn from Duplantis, and I think you can learn from Stevenson. I also think that you might learn from Hooker. You might be able to find your niche in between the technique of these 3 somewhere ... with your split ... to SOME degree of exaggeration. Time will tell.
LHSVaulterJJR wrote: ... lemme get it right before we throw it out the window...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97b21/97b215470b986430d17bf09d505bf3b6be6b2a4d" alt="Yes :yes:"
Exactly!
LHSVaulterJJR wrote: ... even if i miss the bend of the pole that way .. i could just create more bend by ( o god i know im getting murdered for this one
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b6a8/7b6a8d1c84a8401b809e3291239cc5d5b13f0e3e" alt="Crying :crying:"
) rowing ...
Don't go there yet! I'm going to take the stance that you WON'T need to row! So it's WAY too early to even discuss that! I'm guessing that you just need to tuck in your lead leg quicker. But here I go speculating again ... I need to see a REAL JUMP!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e292f/e292f8617215a66a570408d37dfbde54b312bdcd" alt="Wink ;)"
Kirk