Metric / English Frustration

A forum to discuss anything that has to do with pole vaulting that does not fit in the other forums.

Moderators: Russ, lonpvh

nolevault
PV Fan
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Metric / English Frustration

Unread postby nolevault » Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:13 pm

As a mathematician, by trade, i'm a little bamboozled about the way that the IAAF, NCAA, USATF, or whoever is converting from metric to english. I've looked at all the numbers to figure out a reason for the conversion, but nothing seems to work for every conversion. I realize what the correct numbers are based on posts, etc., but I am frustrated that I can't calculate them mathematically. If anyone knows why the conversions are the way they are, PLEASE fill me in on it.
The greatest gift I ever received was the look on a young vaulters' face after setting a PR!

User avatar
OAKPV2004
PV Follower
Posts: 650
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 4:37 pm
Location: the woodlands, texas
Contact:

Unread postby OAKPV2004 » Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:24 pm

ok. say you have 4.90m that is 16'0.75" because it does not reach 16-1 completly. it is about 16' 0.9" but since the sport goes by quarter inches the height is 16'0.75". the last full quarter inch.

zack

Unread postby zack » Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:46 pm

Maybe you should just print this out http://www.polevaultpower.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=141

nolevault
PV Fan
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Unread postby nolevault » Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:01 pm

I can print it out, I can get it in the big green book, but i'ts more important to me to be able to figure it out. That's the problem i'm having. I want to know why the numbers are the way they are, then I will always be able to convert, with or without a chart. It's that whole give a man a fish feed him for a day thing, i guess.
The greatest gift I ever received was the look on a young vaulters' face after setting a PR!

nolevault
PV Fan
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Unread postby nolevault » Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:04 pm

Oak,

Thats what I thought initially as well, but that doesn't always work. For example 2.00 meters is 6'6.740157". However it is listed by the powers to be as 6'6.75". Therein lies a situation where the conversion is actually higer than the height jumped. That is a high jump example. I stopped after investigating between 2.00 and 2.99 meters
The greatest gift I ever received was the look on a young vaulters' face after setting a PR!

zack

Unread postby zack » Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:11 am

Like a lot of things in track I don't think there is a good explanation. :P Personally I just try and memorize as much of it as I need to.

User avatar
vaulter580
PV Whiz
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 2:08 pm
Location: jonesboro, Arkansas
Contact:

Unread postby vaulter580 » Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:06 pm

just remember that every 10 cm is about 4 inches, and so on, so 5.20m is 17' and some change, 5.30m=17'4" and change.....and so on...and so on...
BZ
Arkansas State University
sign yo pitty on da runny kine!!!

Skyin' Brian
PV Master
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: illinois
Contact:

Unread postby Skyin' Brian » Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:56 pm

did you know that conversions are different in the vertical jumps than horizontal jumps as they are always rounded down to the last 1/4 inch or centimeter. and in horizontal jumps they are based on probablilities.
for instance 5m is 16-4.75 in the vault and 16-5 in the lj

nolevault
PV Fan
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Unread postby nolevault » Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:11 pm

brian wrote
did you know that conversions are different in the vertical jumps than horizontal jumps as they are always rounded down to the last 1/4 inch or centimeter. and in horizontal jumps they are based on probablilities.
for instance 5m is 16-4.75 in the vault and 16-5 in the lj


the vertical jump conversions do not always measure down to the nearest 1/4 inch. for example 2.05 is 6'8.75", however 2.05 is really 6'8.708661inches, so the converted height is actually higher than the actual height. If it always went to the lesser 1/4 inch 2.05 would be 6'8.5".
Once again you can see how frustrating this conversion is.
The greatest gift I ever received was the look on a young vaulters' face after setting a PR!

User avatar
rainbowgirl28
I'm in Charge
Posts: 30435
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
Lifetime Best: 11'6"
Gender: Female
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
Location: A Temperate Island
Contact:

Unread postby rainbowgirl28 » Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:15 pm

Bill Roe gave me a 4 page chart for converting. When officials convert, they don't do it by a math problem, it is by a chart.

I think someone just did the math one day, and decided whether to round up or down :P It's probably never going to make perfect sense to you.

vaultinggoat16
PV Whiz
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 10:47 pm
Location: Winona, Texas
Contact:

Unread postby vaultinggoat16 » Mon Mar 15, 2004 12:01 am

Sounds to me like someone lit up one day and sat down to make this chart :P
-B
What poles are made of fiberglass now....

JohnS
PV Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:42 pm
World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie

Re: Metric / English Frustration

Unread postby JohnS » Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:01 pm

nolevault wrote:As a mathematician, by trade, i'm a little bamboozled about the way that the IAAF, NCAA, USATF, or whoever is converting from metric to english. I've looked at all the numbers to figure out a reason for the conversion, but nothing seems to work for every conversion. I realize what the correct numbers are based on posts, etc., but I am frustrated that I can't calculate them mathematically. If anyone knows why the conversions are the way they are, PLEASE fill me in on it.


Obviously, this response is years too late. However, the rounding algorithm is pretty simple. The converted mark is either that obtained by truncation or the next mark higher. Whether it truncates or rounds up is controlled by a rounding offset (which depends on the event) and is roughly explained in the introduction to the Big Gold Book (BGB). Except for the offset, they use exact conversions, 1" = 2.54 cm.

For pole vault (and high jump), BGB asserts the rounding offset is 0.2 cm. What they don't explain is that because the both metric and english marks are quantized, a small range of offsets performs exactly the same. Any value such that 0.200 cm =< offset < 0.205 cm. I like to use 0.202 cm (0.00202 m).

Example:
4.90 m
Add offset, 4.90202 m
Convert 16' 0.9929"
Truncate to lesser 1/4 in, 16-00.75

2.00 m, add offset, 2.00202 m
Convert 6-06.8197
Truncate to lesser 1/4 in, 6-06.75

Long jump, triple jump, and shotput are similar but use a different factor, such that
0.495 cm =< offset < 0.5 cm (BGB states they use 0.4999 cm, I suggest 0.497 cm)

In floating point, it is best to avoid the lower equality, tiny floating point errors may cause rounding problems. It is not necessary to use the exact center value, but use a value away from both ends. The upper inequality must be avoided.


Return to “Pole Vault - General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests