Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
- rainbowgirl28
- I'm in Charge
- Posts: 30435
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
- Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
- Lifetime Best: 11'6"
- Gender: Female
- World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
- Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
- Location: A Temperate Island
- Contact:
Re: Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
For the $40,000 difference in price, I think that meet directors could afford to fly in the best bar putter uppers from anywhere in the world.
- Robert schmitt
- PV Lover
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:41 pm
- Location: Mount Vernon, WA
- Contact:
Re: Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
Nahh.... just make the pegs even shorter, give them less time between attempts, and less attemtps to speed things up to make up for the difference.
An optimist is one who sees a light in darkness....a pessimist blows it out.
- polevaulter08nw
- PV Master
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 8:33 pm
- Expertise: College Vaulter, Coach
- Lifetime Best: 5.40
- Favorite Vaulter: Renaud Lavillinie
- Location: Greensboro, NC
- Contact:
Re: Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
hahaha, couldn't resist posting a laugh to that...
Age:22
PR: 5.40
Indiana University '13
University of North Carolina '12
PR: 5.40
Indiana University '13
University of North Carolina '12
- vaultmd
- PV Enthusiast
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 6:18 pm
- Expertise: Masters Vaulter, Coach, Doctor
- Lifetime Best: 475
- World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
- Favorite Vaulter: Laura Huarte
- Location: Roseville, CA
- Contact:
Re: Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
rainbowgirl28 wrote:For the $40,000 difference in price, I think that meet directors could afford to fly in the best bar putter uppers from anywhere in the world.
That would be yours truly . . .
-
- PV Whiz
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:36 pm
- Expertise: Former High School Vaulter, Current College Vaulter, Huge Fan!
- Lifetime Best: 13-6
- Favorite Vaulter: Renaud Lavillenie
- Location: Moore Fieldhouse @ SCSU
- Contact:
Re: Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
Although I haven't been to any meets where they have been used (unless they have been used at Boston Indoor Games without me noticing or them breaking), I'm on the fence with this one. When they work correctly, I believe that they allow the competition to flow at a smoother pace than with manual standards.
That being said, rather than banning them altogether, I think that they should be analyzed to figure out what is causing them to fail so often. Once the weak point(s) is/are established, the engineer should go back to the drawing board and redesign them in a more proper manner, changing what needs to be changed to make them far less susceptible to failure or eliminate the problem altogether.
Just my .02
-Bill
P.S. - I'm currently working as an intern at General Dynamics Electric Boat in Groton, CT (the primary builder of fast attack submarines for the U.S. Navy since the early 1900s) so I have access to CAD software and such. Maybe I'll take a stab at the standards...
That being said, rather than banning them altogether, I think that they should be analyzed to figure out what is causing them to fail so often. Once the weak point(s) is/are established, the engineer should go back to the drawing board and redesign them in a more proper manner, changing what needs to be changed to make them far less susceptible to failure or eliminate the problem altogether.
Just my .02
-Bill
P.S. - I'm currently working as an intern at General Dynamics Electric Boat in Groton, CT (the primary builder of fast attack submarines for the U.S. Navy since the early 1900s) so I have access to CAD software and such. Maybe I'll take a stab at the standards...
Last edited by LHSvaulter on Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Apparently, I look a lot like Michael Phelps
Re: Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
That being said, rather than banning them altogether, I think that they should be analyzed to figure out what is causing them to fail so often. Once the weak point(s) is/are established, the engineer should go back to the drawing board and redesign them in a more proper manner, changing what needs to be changed to make them far less susceptible to failure or eliminate the problem altogether.
I agree. I also work with automation in machine tools, and I have no doubt that I could build reliable standards for far less money than is being mentioned here.
- rainbowgirl28
- I'm in Charge
- Posts: 30435
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 1:59 pm
- Expertise: Former College Vaulter, I coach and officiate as life allows
- Lifetime Best: 11'6"
- Gender: Female
- World Record Holder?: Renaud Lavillenie
- Favorite Vaulter: Casey Carrigan
- Location: A Temperate Island
- Contact:
Re: Automatic Standards - SHOULD BE BANNED
I don't believe they have ever been used in the US, except for the 1996 Olympics.
Greg Hull told me today that after they broke, they swapped them out for normal standards, but no one (from Doha) had a clue how to put the bar up that high. so Hooker had to teach them.
Or something like that.
Greg Hull told me today that after they broke, they swapped them out for normal standards, but no one (from Doha) had a clue how to put the bar up that high. so Hooker had to teach them.
Or something like that.
Return to “Pole Vault - International”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests