vault3rb0y wrote:... You should be trying to fully invert before the pole even begins to recoil. This won't happen by swinging faster, it happens with a proper take off and swing. ...
Altho this is a good target to strive for, it's not really attainable ... not if you take the word "fully" literally.
Using Hooker as a model, he doesn't get FULLY inverted until very late in the swing ... yet he puts continuous pressure on the system by a long, deliberate swing.
On the other end of the scale, Greg Duplantis (not to be confused with his kids ... who are becoming just as famous now) inverted very early ... as I did. Even then, I would not call this FULLY inverted. I would say, tho, that "the earlier the better".
In talking about inverting, we're really not talking about being 100% upside down on the pole. What we're really talking about is being ahead of the timing of the pole ... by getting the hips up above the shoulders as early as possible ... so that when the pole BEGINS to recoil, you're not fighting it by "muscling up". Instead, you're still "swinging up".
3P0, altho I agree that a proper takeoff and swing is key, I would also argue with you that you should not also swing faster. No matter how fast you think you're swinging, you can always swing faster. The faster the downswing (trail leg whip), the better chance to stay ahead of the timing of the pole, and the better chance for an early inversion. An early inversion eliminates "muscling up".
Alternatively, you could swing continuously like Hooker (late inversion) ... but I haven't seen many mere mortal do that. He has exceptional runway speed and an exceptionally high grip. I don't know if you can scale that back to the 3-5m range. It seems to me that the timing of the pole will get ahead of you if you try that.
Kirk