altius wrote:"Quality of experience can be a tremendously difference maker even if you haven't been at it for very long!" Suggest you go and talk to the senior physicians in your hospital and see what they say about that!
Not trying to usurp experience or authority for that matter. Just saying, you can have a good newbie and a bad newbie! Perhaps some of the more "haughty" doctors won't take the comment so well but senior physicians will generally say about the same: Learn well in med school/take in as much as you can and you'll be fine, learn poorly/waste time and you'll be crying in hospital wishing you were elsewhere! It's all about how you respond to your training, you can sit in the class but you have to be present and active! I don't want to present time of experience and quality of experience as if they were unrelated - where in fact they are two pieces of a larger whole. If we want to get philosophical and metaphysical, we could ask the question - "what is time?" A person who under-utilizes their time does not see a week the same way as a person who lives a lifetime in one day! Essentially, it's up to a person to make the very most out of what they have. There is also a factor of who receives good training. I consider myself to be exceptionally lucky that I ran into the right pole vault crowd from day one! Miraculously lucky even! Regardless of how well I would have used my time, it wouldn't be the same if I didn't have my "pole vault upbringing". Training/studying diligently is all good but there's no sense in practicing the wrong thing perfectly!
I'll give another possible answer tomorrow - gotta finish an assignment right now!
-Andrew