Page 1 of 1
Whats the Deal>
Posted: Thu May 29, 2003 11:24 am
by theflyingkorean
I know this has probably been answered 1000000 times, but I'm going to ask it again. What is the difference between Pacer Carbons and Pacer Carbon FXes? Just wonderting.
Posted: Thu May 29, 2003 12:27 pm
by Decamouse
Pacer Carbon - pre FX design - different sale piece and location - slightly heavier than the FX design - where and how much carbon also changed - FX is basically the next generation -
Posted: Thu May 29, 2003 11:37 pm
by Ajint_Smith
Generally, you must drive longer on a carbon and swing up faster because the energy in the pole is quite powerful. Regular FX's are much easier to vault on than carbon fxs.
Posted: Fri May 30, 2003 7:38 am
by Decamouse
Much like the Matrix - preception and reality - which is which - the pole has no energy by itself - it is what force you apply to it and how it returns this energy - carbon fibers are stronger and stiffer allowing for a lighter pole. Assuming it is built properly - but - if you don't vault with decent tech. - it really doesn't matter