Pacer FX vs. Carbon FX

[mcminkz05]

Ok, just got a quick pole question~ i tried a Pacer FX a few days ago, and i loved it. But i would like to use a Pacer Carbon FX if it is similar to the normal Pacer FX. How sim;lar are the FX and the Carbon FX? obviously one is Carbon, but do they both act the same, or does the Carbon change the pole allot??

[PVJunkie]

I am assuming you will be at the beach vault.........ask Bryan, he will be under the maroon pop up tent.

[mcminkz05]

no, i will not be at the beach vault. i just got home from training wit my coach, and found out i have to leave tomorrow.

so does anyone know the differences between the Fx and Carbon Fx??

[Decamouse]

Weight is the easy one - The same length and pole rating weight - the Carbon FX will be physically lighter to carry than the the same non-carbon pole - thye both use the FX concept for sail design and placement - response or acceleration potential - most vaulters feel that carbon is a bit more aggressive - hopefully in 6 months I can give you eng. type numbers that may help

[mcminkz05]

k, so they sound pretty similar. wonderin cause i really loved my Pacer Fx and want to get a Carbon Fx if the two are technically similar.