dougb wrote: "it's been associated with the death of a lot of pretty damn good pole vaulters like yourself."
I have a feeling that this is an urban myth. I may be wrong but could you back this up.
I too have difficulty in believing that tapping has led to death. Sounds like an exaggeration to me, but I will stand corrected if it's actually true. I think it's more dangerous for the coach than the vaulter, as seen in this vid ...
http://www.polevaultpower.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=18808. A little bit funny ... but really not so funny!
If the suggestion that tapping leads to deaths was a scare tactic, then shame on you. We don't need fear-mongering ... we need FACTS!
dougb wrote: Gymnastics coaches use them all of the time to teach giants.
This is a poor argument for why it's OK for VAULT coaches to tap.
In highbar, the action of a giant is relatively simple ... the gymnast just hangs on tight ... or uses grips that
guarantee that he'll hang on ... keeps his body fairly straight ... and generates enough momentum on his downswing and whip to complete each giant. When first learning a giant, a tap is a definite help ... both psychologically and to ensure that there's sufficient momentum so that the gymnast doesn't stall out. When doing a giant, the gymnast has no choice but to propel his entire body weight over the bar ... he can't drop 10-20 pounds to get the hang of it, then revert back to his normal body weight ... he has no choice. There's a very real danger if the gymnast stalls out and lands on the bar ... or lands on the mat head-first (if he's not using the proper grips). There's also the very real danger that a rookie gymnast could misuse the grips and tear ligaments in his wrists. This is why the gym coach spots and taps when needed.
In comparison, the action of a vault is relatively complex ... the vaulter must execute a complicated series of body actions ... run, plant, jump, pre-stretch, downswing, whip, upswing, invert, extend ... all whilst going top speed down the runway, hanging onto a pole, and swinging around the top hand whilst the pole is rotating around its butt in the box. This is a way more complex series of actions than a simple giant. These inter-dependent actions of the vaulter-pole system are fraught with the potential for the vaulter to stall out and land in the box ... or inadvertently clear the entire pit to any of its other 3 sides ... and in no way does a tap on a big pole equate to getting on it without a tap ... false confidence.
While some inexperienced vaulters might think that the answer is for the coach to SPOT and to TAP the vaulter ... just like a gym coach spots and taps a gymnast on the highbar ... in case the vaulter inadvertently stalls out ... this idea introduces just as many problems as it solves ... if not more.
Becuz of the complexities of the vault ... and becuz it's easier to learn, improve, and perfect your technique with the RIGHT SIZE of pole for each and every practice or competitive situation, tapping just gets in the way of learning "proper" technique. I don't particularly think it's dangerous ... but I definitely think it's INEFFECTIVE for its intended purpose ... whether the coach and vaulter recognize this ineffectiveness or not.
Since this has been my 3rd serious post on this thread ... and based on the past performance of 2012, I know I'm almost guaranteed of getting an argumentative reply ... this will probably be my last post on this thread.
Polevaulter2012 wrote:Really? no one has any tips or anything?
It's such a shame that you've asked for tips ... compained that no one had any ... until one of the most reknowned PV coaches on the planet TRIED to give you some good advice ... and you not only rejected his advice, but you insulted him by saying that he "read BTB2" ... when in fact he WROTE it!
Once you found out his level of expertise, you didn't relent in your rejection of his advice.
You subsequently rejected the good advice ... some VERY good advice ... of many other vaulters and coaches that are far more knowledgeable on the topic than yourself ... guys like Wally, Vaulterboy, Golfdane, Andy, Chasing, and Rainbowgirl. As I see it, you've burnt your bridges.
And your rebuttals are almost comical. For these reasons ... I'm out.
Kirk