High Jump
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:17 pm
So I went to my daughter's gymnastics event today and came away thinking about the high jump...
Following a couple of back hand-springs, some of these athletes pop off the ground pretty high with a two foot take off. I realize that the floor is spring-loaded, but I'll bet even off a track surface, somebody could launch pretty high...even higher than 8 feet with a tightly tucked back flip or two before landing.
If the goal of track and field is to get from point A to point B as fast as possible, or jump as far as possible, or throw as far as possible, why limit ourselves to a one footed take-off in the high jump when a two footed take off may create higher records?
I'm sure there is some aspect of a safety factor here, but it seems a little restrictive. Kind of like race walking...get from here to there as fast as possible. Oh, but you can't run. Just wondering about the history of the one-foot jump rule.
ifavault
www.inflightathletics.com
Following a couple of back hand-springs, some of these athletes pop off the ground pretty high with a two foot take off. I realize that the floor is spring-loaded, but I'll bet even off a track surface, somebody could launch pretty high...even higher than 8 feet with a tightly tucked back flip or two before landing.
If the goal of track and field is to get from point A to point B as fast as possible, or jump as far as possible, or throw as far as possible, why limit ourselves to a one footed take-off in the high jump when a two footed take off may create higher records?
I'm sure there is some aspect of a safety factor here, but it seems a little restrictive. Kind of like race walking...get from here to there as fast as possible. Oh, but you can't run. Just wondering about the history of the one-foot jump rule.
ifavault
www.inflightathletics.com