IAmTheWalrus wrote:Where is the peak strength to weight ratio?
I gave this some thought yesterday, in regards to which athlete body-types our dieting and weight-lifting advice would apply to.
I think the simplest, most obvious answer is that if you're ABOVE the norm (of sex-specific pole vaulters or gymnasts - whomever you're comparing yourself to), then you should watch your calories and be cautious about any training that might cause you to bulk up. The opposite advice, I think, would apply to anyone BELOW the norm. That is, you can and should bulk up to the norm without worrying about your weight.
For these "skinny" athletes, they're lacking strength, and are likely to have a low-strength/low-weight ratio, so should do more weight-training (or gymnastic movements) to increase their strength - and shouldn't worry about adding a few pounds.
Note that the "norm" doesn't apply to the norm of all gymnasts or all PVers. Rather, it applies to the norm of ELITE athletes to whom you aspire to emulate. They're the ones that have defined the "ideal strength-to-weight ratio".
What are these numbers? For male PVers, look no further than the weights and heights of vaulters in the 6-meter club here:
http://polevaultpower.com/6mclub.phpThis table doesn't actually show their STRENGTH to weight ratio, as STRENGTH is still unkown - it's not readily available from the table. So instead, we look at HEIGHT to weight ratio. IMHO, it's not as revealing of a ratio as strength-to-weight, but it's all that we have right now. It might be more desirable to compare the sum of their PRs of certain Olympic lifts, and maybe bench press as well. But that data's not available, so we just use height instead.
Keep in mind that height-to-weight ratio is only one attribute of an elite athlete. For example, it says nothing about speed down the runway or gymnastic coordination. And it's only CLOSELY (but not exactly) related to STRENGTH-to-weight. Explosive speed and flexibility are also related, important attributes - as you mentioned.
Code: Select all
Name Ht(cm) Wt(kg) Ht/Wt
Danny Ecker 193 78 2.47
Igor Tradenkov 190 78 2.44
Maxim Tarasov 194 81 2.40
Rodion Gataulin 190 81 2.35
Tim Mack 188 80 2.35
Tim Lobinger 190 82 2.32
Sergei Bubka 183 80 2.29
Toby Stevenson 186 82 2.27
Dmitri Markov 181 80 2.26
Steve Hooker 187 83 2.25
Brad Walker 188 84 2.24
Jean Galfione 184 82 2.24
Okert Brits 196 88 2.23
Paul Burgess 183 83 2.20
Jeff Hartwig 194 92 2.11
Wally 2007 182 77 2.36
Kirk 182 78 2.33
Wally 2008 182 82 2.23
This line of thinking is based on "natural selection, or survival of the fittest" (Darwin, Spencer). These athletes may not have PERFECT strength to weight ratios, but it's highly likely that they have VERY GOOD S-W ratios! Enough to "survive" above "the competition".
You will notice that I've added our heights and weights to the table, for comparison. I think it's best to narrow the comparison down to elite vaulters of a similar height. In that comparison, we fare not too badly. Even this year, you're lighter (for your height) than Burgess. Last year, we were both lighter (for our height) than Bubka, Markov, and Galfione!
Again, don't read TOO MUCH into this. I think what it says is that you're not "out of range" in comparison to 6-meter club members! So there's hope for you in joining that club yet! Ha! Ha!
I would be interested to hear what y'all think of these metrics. To me, the range is surprisingly wide. It tells me that you can be anywhere within this range and still jump 6.00m. But it also tells me that if you're outside of this range, then you have some serious work ahead of you (either bulk up or trim down) if you ever hope to "join the club"!
Kirk