Unread postby vault3rb0y » Fri May 22, 2009 5:02 pm
Only from personal experience, i feel that our whole goal is strength FOR OUR BODY WEIGHT. I found it very interesting that the gymnastic guys at PSU are the most cut and look like the strongest guys on campus- and they do absolutely no lifting. Obviously there are benefits of lifting, but i think those benefits should be carefully monitored by a coach for each individual athlete.
I feel differently about lower-body strength training, however. Getting faster requires turn over and stride length, which comes mostly from running correctly but can be greatly increased with strength training. I even talked to college coaches my junior year in HS and asked them what, if any, specific part of my training should i focus on the rest of high school, to set myself up for success in college. They told me getting stronger and faster in my legs, then letting them take over from there. I believe 1-legged squats and lunges coupled with plyometrics are ok for high schoolers. It's absolutely crucial that they be taught with correct form and that the reps do not go under 6 for risk of injury, IMHO. The heavy back tension just doesn't seem right for a kid that's barely hit puberty yet. Also, i feel that the actual running, training, and STRETCHING should have more emphasis than lifting. I saw more back injuries and leg muscle tears/strains in those athletes lifting all summer then coming out for track, than those with much more running/stretching than lifting in their schedules. Even though they got really strong, it was actually hurting their running because they were too bulky to be athletic.
The greater the challenge, the more glorious the triumph