Hate to say it, but us at the DII and III level are not just a bunch of pole riders... take a look at last years mens indoor champ at DIII indoors...
1 Hans Schmidt Jr Wisconsin La Crosse 18-1 (5.51m) ÂÂ
women:
1 Amanda Haines So Adrian College 12-11 (3.94m) Meet record
2 Kim Marino Sr Richard Stockton 12-11 (3.94m)  Betters old Meet record
3 Megan Rossi Fr North Central College 11-11 1/4 (3.64m) ÂÂ
some of these werent even the best of the year for some of the girls competing in the Championships last indoors...
*number two in the Nation right now for men DII (Mark Zilch, Lewis University 5.50/18.05) there are more among the DII & DIII, NAIA ranks that are at 5.18 and above.
*(according to vaultngus)
women arent too far behind... there are quite a few DII, DIII and NAIA women at or above 3.81 (12.6.0)
These athletes are not the only ones who are at this level (many are better than these marks(women), or just at or below Hans' Mark at 18-1.
The thing is, its not just the vault... track & field as a whole, is doing well at the "small school" level... Andrew Rock of UW-Lacrosse (DIII) won a gold medal with the US 4x400 in Athens. Many other DII, DIII and NAIA athletes were at Sacremento for the OLY trials and were among the top ten in their respective events... I won't even mention all the international students who ran for their respective countries.
Granted, we also have the other end of the spectrum as well... which especially visible in the DIII level. This is what makes people think we are "sub-standard" of sorts and look down on DIII vs other divisions. Most DIII schools do not usually have a "try-out" or a "cut" of any sort, so we get the good with the bad. One thing i guess i enjoy about this is: everyone on the team is there becuase they love the sport and they want to participate. What becomes of these individuals though, are most of your high school coaches. So we need them too. (now i could go on and on about this but i digress)
I just think DII and DIII arent the respect they deserve. Just because a "Student Athlete" decides to go to a small school dosent make them any less an athlete or lessen their abilities.
I enjoy the fact that many of the vaulters in the confernce in which I coach in actually compete and push their DI counter-parts... we will head out west and to the south for our spring trips to get some good weather for the outdoor season, but even more, we want quality competion against DI schools, to not only make us better but to show our athletes that they can compete with the best.
As for High School Vaulters who hit 4.70 or better thinking they "deserve" to go DI, I think these athletes need to look more at other variables... OBVIOUSLY education in the program they are looking for... but regarding a team or program... Look at the Coaching and history of the vaulters and records. there are some Excellent coaches out there in the DII and DIII level... some very excellent 4.0 h.s. jumpers have gone on vault in the 5.20 to 5.45 range, all because of excellent coaching and training partners within the team they have been built with.
Us lowly "small" schools respect what you have, sometimes admire the fact that we might have it better on occasion to our DI counter-parts. But make no mistake, we vault and we love it just the same as the rest of the Vaulting world. Look at the accomplishments of the Vaulters, not the fact that they are competing for "Anywhere" State University, DII DIII or NAIA. They work just as hard as the rest, only they do it in peaceful obscurity.
Collegiate Vaulting isnt about what level (DI, DII, DIII, NAIA) you vault at... its the fact that you are good enought to compete at the Collegiate level and how high you vault while you are there.
-gbob