Darth Vaulter wrote: I also thought this situation was analogous to one where a properly released pole is falling back away from the bar and the standards and anything that could affect either, is caught by a the pole/step catcher and then he or she stumbles and knocks the bar off. That certainly would not have been a miss. Here the pole literally rose from the dead and dislodged the bar.
Along the same lines, I was thinking that perhaps it's similar to if a vaulter ATTEMPTS to throw the pole back, but a gust of wind (or something else outside of the vaulter's control) blows it back and knocks the bar off.
In this case, it wasn't a fluke of nature, but simply another kind of fluke. Since the vaulter clearly threw the pole away from the bar (or at least attempted to), and clearly cleared the bar, the fact that the pole popped back up and hit the crossbar off is AFTER the vault is over, isn't it?
So my vote is that it's a MAKE (and within the rules), because either (a) the bar was knocked off AFTER it was cleanly cleared - with the pole supposedly going AWAY from the bar; or (b) the vaulter made a PROPER attempt to push the pole back (albeit too strong of a push) and thru a fluke (not ENTIRELY the vaulter's own fault), the pole knocked off the bar.
I realize that this is purely hypothetical, since it's such a fluke it might never happen again. But what if ...
... the pole catcher was quick enough to CATCH the pole after it bounced off the front bun, but before it struck the bar? Would that be INTERFERENCE by the pole-catcher, or not?
Or can the "
LACK OF INTERFERENCE" by the pole-catcher be blamed for why the pole hit the bar?
Kirk